FS
Documentation

LTO vs SDLT

From Documentation

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 01:37, 26 June 2006
Moff (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 01:44, 26 June 2006
Moff (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 1: Line 1:
 +== LTO versus SDLT ==
 +
Two competing tape technologies dominate the enterprise backup segment, LTO and SDLT. The current top 2 drive technologies are LTO3 and SDLT600 respectively. Both products represent evolution from a previous generation rather than complete new products. This is preferable as it ensures compatibility with a large range of existing tape libraries and provides backward read compatibility with the previous generation of product. Both factors offer continued protection of investment. Two competing tape technologies dominate the enterprise backup segment, LTO and SDLT. The current top 2 drive technologies are LTO3 and SDLT600 respectively. Both products represent evolution from a previous generation rather than complete new products. This is preferable as it ensures compatibility with a large range of existing tape libraries and provides backward read compatibility with the previous generation of product. Both factors offer continued protection of investment.
Line 6: Line 8:
In the comparison table below the HP Ultrium LTO2 product specs have been used. The HP drive incorporates Adaptive Tape Speed which dynamically matches the transfer rates of slower hosts (from 10 MB/s upwards), which increases performance, reduces mechanical wear on the drive and extends tape life. In the comparison table below the HP Ultrium LTO2 product specs have been used. The HP drive incorporates Adaptive Tape Speed which dynamically matches the transfer rates of slower hosts (from 10 MB/s upwards), which increases performance, reduces mechanical wear on the drive and extends tape life.
 +
 +
 +{| border="1" cellpadding="7" cellspacing="0"
 +!
 +!align="center" | LTO3<br>HP Ultrium 960
 +!align="center" | SDLT600<br>Quantum
 +!align="center" | LTO2<br>HP Ultrium 460
 +!align="center" | SDLT320<br>Quantum
 +|-
 +!Native Capacity (GB)
 +}

Revision as of 01:44, 26 June 2006

LTO versus SDLT

Two competing tape technologies dominate the enterprise backup segment, LTO and SDLT. The current top 2 drive technologies are LTO3 and SDLT600 respectively. Both products represent evolution from a previous generation rather than complete new products. This is preferable as it ensures compatibility with a large range of existing tape libraries and provides backward read compatibility with the previous generation of product. Both factors offer continued protection of investment.

The LT03 significantly raises the bar, both in capacity per tape and with significantly higher drive transfer rates. To obtain the maximum performance from these new drives it will be important to use a back-up server equipped with the appropriate newer generation of high speed interface cards (see SCSI Information). Typically these servers will utilise PCI-X interface technology which provides internal bus speeds capable of supporting these data rates. [Functional Software has conducted testing with these higher performance drives and can ensure you get the most from your implementation of LT03 based libraries.]

DLT tape has been the other tape standard for enterprise use for many years. There are thousands of companies around the world that rely on this well proven technology to protect their data. The SDLT600 is read compatible with the SDLT320 but utilises a new cartridge, Super DLTtape II, to obtain its 300Gbyte native (600Gbyte compressed) capacity. The previous generation product, the SDLT 320, used the same Super DLTtape I cartridges as the SDLT 220 and is backward read compatible with DLTtape IV media, preserving investments in previous DLT technologies. For this reason alone DLT will continue to be a player in the tape market.

In the comparison table below the HP Ultrium LTO2 product specs have been used. The HP drive incorporates Adaptive Tape Speed which dynamically matches the transfer rates of slower hosts (from 10 MB/s upwards), which increases performance, reduces mechanical wear on the drive and extends tape life.


LTO3
HP Ultrium 960
SDLT600
Quantum
LTO2
HP Ultrium 460
SDLT320
Quantum
Native Capacity (GB)

}